IEPClock

About IEPClock

Know the deadline. Send the letter.

IEPClock started with a frustration Eric ran into while helping a friend figure out whether her son's school district had actually missed the deadline for his special-education evaluation. Every forum and blog post gave a different number — 30 days, 45 days, 60 days — with no citation, and the district's own paperwork never stated a deadline at all.

So he built something better. IEPClock is a free, no-account-required tool that shows you exactly where your child's evaluation stands against IDEA's federal 60-day clock — and drafts the formal letter to send if the district has missed it, citing the exact regulation.

Eric
Founder, IEPClock

Eric has spent years building small, single-purpose reference tools rather than working in special education — his interest here is procedural, not legal or clinical. The federal evaluation timeline is public regulation, but no one had turned it into something a stressed parent could check in thirty seconds. He built IEPClock to fix that.

Part of the Veraino network of free websites.

How it works

Every tool on IEPClock is grounded in a documented, citable method — a published formula, an authoritative standard, or a well-established model. We don't approximate or invent numbers. If we can't cite a primary source for the logic, we don't publish the tool.

For IEPClock specifically, every date rule traces to a named section of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the IDEA implementing regulations) — never a paraphrase of “the law says.” We compute the federal floor only; if your state sets its own (typically shorter) timeline, that deadline can be earlier than what this site shows — see the scope note on the evaluation deadline tool.

Our commitments

  • Free, no sign-up required. Every tool on this site is free to use with no account, subscription, or paywall.
  • We show our work. Every tool explains its methodology, cites its sources, and surfaces assumptions — so you can verify the logic, not just trust the output.
  • Honest about limitations. Where precision is limited or assumptions are required, we say so. Tools compute; they don't replace professional judgment.
  • Kept current. Tools that use figures that can change over time carry a “last reviewed” date and are treated as an ongoing maintenance responsibility, not a one-time build.

Get in touch

Questions, corrections, or suggestions: hello@iepclock.com. Eric reads every message personally.